Some tips on how to build a subwoofer cabinet

Posted by admin | build a subwoofer | Sunday 9 August 2009 8:46 am

The first time I attempted to build a subwoofer cabinet was back in 1999. Back then I was big into the music and DJing scene and wanted to add something to compliment our communal practice session setup. The setup had a great set of technics MK12 turntables, a Numark mixer with great feeling sliders and a nice LED matrix that can help you visualize the mix. We had the whole system running through an off the shelf 50 watt speaker setup that was very subpar so I decided that speakers and an amp would be my addition to the mix.

The objective:

One big downside to traditional PA speaker systems is that they relied on two drivers: A subwoofer, and a horn driver to cover the entire aural spectrum. The problem with this setup is its loss of fidelity for midrange frequencies which are very essencial to genres such as psychadelic trance, vocal trance and jazzy house. So the plan was to build a capable cabinet system that combined enough thump to fill up a house party littered with DJ’s and local talent, all the while being able to give a more rich audible experience than the typical 2 driver PA speaker (which is obviously designed more for filling a bigger room than filling it beautifully with perfect music).

The speaker design was simple and effective based on cheap (I was a college student at the time) but effective components:

Components:

A pair of crunch audio 15 inch subwoofers (one per cabinet), rated at 300Watts.
Four Midrange 5.25 inch speakers. Each of these would be able to handle 150Watts and so 2 were wired up per cabinet matching the 300Watt sub with a 300 Watts of midrange.
Two 3″ titanium bullet tweeter horn drivers, capable of an insane 300 watts each with a frequency response down to 3000 hz. Again one per cabinet to match the 300Watt mids and Lows.

At the time I couldn’t find a single 300 Watt midrange speaker so I used two 150 watt speakers instead of a single 300watt midrange driver.

The crossover:

CLAMCD360

Clarion CD360 pre-amp crossover

Using my knowledge from electrical engineering classes I was taking at the time, I designed a simple 3 way crossover with a slope of 12db/Octave based on the impedances of the components that I had already acquired. I threw up the design into PSpice and simulated the crossover’s performance and optimized it, when that was done, I went shopping and picked up the closest inductors and capacitors I could find to the design values to build my Xover. Nothing in the real world is as perfect as it is when it’s designed on the computer. But the result was close enough to be awesome.

One of the other constraints of building this crossover is the fact that we’re crossing over the amplified signal. This means that all the components in our crossover need to have the current handling to be able to withstand 900 Watts of power without overheating and melting. As a solution to this design requirement, you’ll find that some home power audio manufacturers try to cross over the un-amplified audio signal between the signal source and the amplifier rack using a cheaper crossover network. This approach also opens up the opportunity to using different amplifiers for different goals within the system, such as using a power efficient class D MOSFET amplifier for the bass, while using a minimal distortion Class A or Class AB JFET amplifier for the mids and the highs.

Since my system was designed to be a versatile system to be used at home and on the road for events and parties, I chose to use an amplified crossover inside the cabinet housing to simplify using the speakers with any amplifier setup.

The cabinets:

Ported MDF woofer cabinet.

Ported MDF woofer cabinet.

The whole concept of this cabinet was the combination of high SPL with High Quality audio. With a typical 15″ subwoofer you find the setup always lacking some response, with a bigger bass sound but less definition on the faster bass hits. To avoid this stereotypical view of 15″ subwoofers I decided to make a fortified sealed box enclosure to place the subwoofers in rather than a louder vented enclosure. The box was built of 1/4″ MDF (medium density fiberboard), lined with fiberglass sound deadening to reduce enclosure noise, and sealed entirely with silicone caulking to prevent air leakage. If I recall correctly, the design parameter for minimum enclosure space was around 2.5 cuft, so I went with a larger ~3 cuft enclosure.

In order to prevent interference and distortion between the drivers for the bass, midrange and highs, the internals of the enclosure were baffled to section off each portion of the cabinet with 1/4″ MDF and also sealed with silicon caulking after running the wiring between the different internal chambers.

Testing:

Once the cabinets were finally completed, there was a nice amount of ‘theoretical’ debate between myself, my electrical engineering colleagues, and my DJ friends as to weather the final result was in fact a 300 Watt or a 900 Watt system.

After a lot of debate and back and forth conversation I reluctantly agreed to put my product to the test … If you’re familiar with ‘type testing’ procedures, all regulated industries usually ‘type test’ their products to determine maximum tolerances, maximum power handling, limits of destruction and tolerance…etc. I feared that this outing to my friend’s house would end up as a ‘type test’ for my cabinet and that my two weeks of hard work cutting / drilling and assembling MDF would end up with a blown cabinet just to prove the theoretical limits of this cabinet.

At my friend Joe B’s house we hooked up one of my ‘300′ watt speakers to his 1000Watt per channel Mackie amplifier. This amplifier was the corner stone of his own home style DJing and practice station, one that he also took to smaller style events to drive the PA system. We hooked up my speaker to the Mackie, and JoeB put one of his favorite records records on the Tech-12s and started to play… slowly and hesitantly JoeB turned up the gain on his amplifier looking for where and when the speaker would start to complain or distort…

As the knob turned farther to the right, I became more and more anxious , but the midrange and titanium tweeter drives came more and more to life and the system was just insane. The goal of having a high power and clean sounding system with liquid midrange , hard hitting bass, and crisp highs was obviously over acheived and I had apparently over engineered my subwoofer for the target. The knob kept turning right and my fears of blowing my speakers turned to elation and euphoria … Eventually Joe accelerated the rate at which he turned up the volume and cranked the system to MAX gain !!!!! 1000 Watts of Mackie power were now pumping through my ‘home made’ and ‘first ever’ made cabinet and the EQ had to be adjusted with negative corrections past 2000hz to make up for how vivid the mids and highs were… and all in all, the speakers did not complain, distort, or skip a beat.

Despite being a heavy MDF cabinet, on a hard wood floor, the sheer amount of power driving through the speakers made it start to walk across the room floor :) .

I later took my speaker home and realized that our little test on JoeB’s amp had finally broken in this cabinet and the system had never sounded so good.

Takeaways:

Simulation of a 3rd order crossover network

Simulation of a 3rd order crossover network

The only thing I didn’t know at the time about speakers and subwoofers was the true meaning of sensitivity in db. In order to achieve my goal of matching my subs to my mids to my highs in order to build a cabinet that could in all of its components take the abuse of 900 watts, I ended up buying the highest powered midrange speakers I could find at the time (10 years ago) with a rating of 150Watts each. These speakers although had good power rating, had significantly lower sensitivity than my subwoofer and my tweeters.

The result of this mismatch is that when using the cabinet at a lower power level (such as when we had friends over for a DVD night) that the midrange on the speakers – which is where the dialog is in the music spectrum – had a little less gain than the rest of the system. The bass, effects and rumble of the subwoofers were great, the highs were clear and crisp, but unless you were driving the system hard at a house party, at lower power levels the mids were a bit flat.

If you are working with a low power source such as a stock head unit or are going to be using your system at lower power levels often, try to choose speakers and subwoofers with a higher senstivity rating. Speakers with a higher sensitivty rating are able to produce higher sound pressure levels (measured in dB at a standardized distance of 1 meter away from a speaker driven by 1 watt of power) from the same amount of power. That is a speaker with 92db senstivity is about 11 times louder than an 88db speaker running at the same power level.

So if you’re going to power your speakers from a low power source, use higher sensitivity speakers. And if you’re building a balanced cabinet or a balanced system, choose speakers with close or the same sensitivity so that you don’t have to re-equalize your system every time you crank the volume knob.

Note: Interested in a pre-amp crossover for your system, check out this clarion MCD-360 two way / three way crossover, save 127 dollars off of retail and build a subwoofer system to enjoy clean undistorted bass.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

DIY subwoofer equalization

Posted by admin | diy Subwoofer | Saturday 8 August 2009 5:31 am

Diy subwoofer equalization is unknown to most enthusiasts. Even more obscure is that not all subwoofers are created equal. Subwoofers depending on size, placement, and packaging have different characteristics unique to that setup. For example larger subwoofers such as 15 inch or 18 inch subwoofers require larger enclosures for the subwoofer to operate properly. This is partly due to the fact that the larger mass of a bigger sub needs more air inside the box to help the subwoofer move and oscilliate and dampen its oscillations correctly.

The rear wall of the subwoofer box acts as a reflection panel that the subwoofer uses to reflect and compound bass waves to help the subwoofer itself reach a higher peak response (or a harder hit). At the same time the air inside the subwoofer enclosure acts as an air cushion to help dampen the subwoofers return after it excursion and control its oscillation so that it does not distort the sound and is able to track the audio wave accurately; similar to the suspension on your car preventing never ending oscillations and controlling body shake so that the suspension can track the road’s surface.

A side effect of using a larger subwoofer is that a larger moving body in a larger enclosure is more naturally tuned with a lower resonant frequency. This is similar in nature to beating a larger bass drum vs playing the a smaller set of bongos. And so a different sized subwoofer, in a different sized enclosure, with a different set of ports or vents will have a different response to different audio.

These variations can be best understood and visualized through a spectrum analyzer that you can see used in SQ (sound quality) competition…

As you can see in the graph below, the loudness of the subwoofer , measured in dB, varies at different frequencies ranging from 15hz (the lowest possible human audible frequency) up to 200hz. These frequencies from 15 to 200hz are generally considered bass, where mid-bass drivers cover the lower midrange from 250hz up to 2000hz and midrange speakers shine in the range from 2000 to 8000hz where most human voice occurs, after that come the tweeters that take us from 8000 up to 16000hz or more.

Un equalized ported subwoofer

Un equalized ported subwoofer

Anyway, within that range of ‘bass’ frequencies a single vented subwoofer has the response curve shown above with a peak response at around 40 to 50hz. This response is great for music like Rap or hip hop or even psychedelic trance and hard techno with deep and even subsonic bass being a characteristic of these genres of music. However if you were to play things like classic rock and some pop songs on this same system, you will find your bass lacking because those tracks more commonly use bass sounds that are in the higher bass range closer to mid bass or around the 125 to 200hz mark. As you can see from the graph above, an out of the box subwoofer (even if designed by a great company) may not hit all the frequencies you want it to hit properly depending on your style of music.

Once solution to this problem is to get a subwoofer system such as the infiniti basslink system which has an internal sound processor designed for live signal processing to improve the performance of the subwoofer in its enclosure no matter what type of music you throw at it.

EQS-746However, for the diy enthusiast or for someone who already has a set of subwoofers in possibly a home made enclosure, then a parametric equalizer such as the Clarion EQS746 7-band equalizer is the way to go. The EQS 746 has 3 of its 7 bands in the bass and midbass audio range 50 Hz, 125 Hz, 345 Hz. This is something you have to make sure you check for when shopping for an Equalizer that can tune your bass frequencies because some Equalizers only have 1 slider for anything below 500 for example and those won’t work for tuning the details of your bass subwoofer.

A quick way to know if you need such a product installed on your car is to think about this… “Do I constantly find myself playing with the gain knobs and bass boost on my system depending on what song or what genre of music I am listening to?”

If the answer to that question is Yes, then installing and tuning a parametric equalizer can give you a similar bass boost depending on the frequency range where you need the boost the most. This way when you listen to a song that has a different frequency bassline, that frequency will already be boosted and you won’t have to mess with the settings on your audio system from song to song. This way you can spend much more time enjoying your music and less time fiddling with the settings.

Two important frequencies to work with here are the 50hz and 125hz frequency. If you look at our original spectrum image you can see that at 40 to 50hz we have a peak response of 83dB whereas at 125hz the response rolls off to around 66dB. What this means is that your bass at 50hz (when listening to a Rap track with deep bass) is about 17 times louder than your bass at 125hz (when you are listening to rock or classical music). This large difference in loudness is exactly why you find yourself having to fiddle with your gain knobs and exactly what we are trying to solve here.

With the EQS746, (or any similar multi-band EQ) you can lower the gain for the 50hz frequency, and increase the gain for 125hz and 345hz respectively. With some trial and error, and while using music tracks that are known to be good ‘test tracks’ for testing the complete audio range of your sound system, you can find a setting that gives you the most ‘linear’ response across the entire bass range. You resultant spectrum analysis should look something like this:

Equalized system showing better response curve.

Equalized system showing better response curve.

Once you’ve found this flat response, you can adjust the overall gain of your system to increase the whole bass range up with reference to the rest of the audio to make up for taking some gain out of our 50hz range and reducing the overall power of our bass hit. Once you’ve made that adjustment, you are done and you now have ’set it and forget it’ awesome sounding system that can process anything that you throw at it.

Note: Click here to read more about the Clarion EQS-746, improve your bass with diy subwoofer equalization and save 100 dollars off of retail.